Sarah Louise Palin

Or, in anagram speak -'lush paranoia lies'

Lies seems apt, as, well, her entire speech was a kind of lie.
Her "moment of truth" was written by Bush's speech writer -not even her own words.
She practiced speaking this guys words for 5 hours before the speech, and basically, to me, in all reality, is just a talking head/mouthpiece. When I hear a speech, I want authenticity and genuine from the heart talk about substance, not something a parrot could do (I just saw this parrot on Ted, named Einstein...pretty cool).

Lush seems apt, too, as her words, to me, were pronounced with all the words contained in them punched through (probably subliminally, for most people) in her bizarre manner of speaking. By this, if you don't understand me, I mean punching 'bomb' in the word Obama, or ..you get the point. There's nothing wrong with this. But I don't want to start getting sidetracked by how she speaks over what she's saying. The economist blow by blow reaction to her speech in their blog (Eagleton is the heading) actually said they should name a drink after her, because, I assume, people retreat into drink upon facing the madness of the world, as revealed through words being used more richly -like what I imagine a wizard casting spells might do- than just the one intended meaning of the utterance. Like MEAN in meaning. Anyway, I actually thought of alcohol for some reason while she was talking, before I looked up the anagram or visited the Economist.  Maybe because of PUB in RePUBlican?

Paranoia is also an interesting point, in regards to her. She has an us-them mentality that I do not appreciate. Apparently, she was in support of the Bridge to Nowhere at some point, which has not been widely known. Also, there's something about her meeting with Karl Rove before her selection, who plays dirty, as I have seen in a documentary about him. She hunts moose for sport, which isn't necessarily bad, but does she get some perverse kick out of killing things? Does she have any pets? She doesn't believe in evolution, which I find a bit scary. Let me tell her now, that I, God, did not create the moose that she so enjoys killing. Finally, she doesn't even know what the veep position is about, and basically just seems to want to use it as an opportunity to plug drilling in Alaska, which I read McCain doesn't even support. She could be a heartbeat away from the presidency, and only moments ago she was a PTA mom. I suppose that's suppose to be encouraging for all of us?...i.e. fate could land us in the presidency just for being a activist parent? I'm sorry, but I think this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, a possible Sarah Palin as president. She strikes me as mean-spirited, too, frankly. But wait, there's more. She was for banning books at a local library. On the plus side, she's supposedly pro-life, although I suspect war, capital punishment, and other tough-guy Republican positions will remain deathly.

Oh, well. Drink up. Better yet, vote your conscience.

p.s. She also was for banning books at the local library. Geez, it just gets worse and worse.
ALSO, she's being instructed to not talk to the media.
ALSO, she goes to a church where people speak in tongues
I can do that. Gwobble tiggle thwork aba do ku shi chu mao bi shlorp!
Remember, God is in ALL things, lol.
I suspect Karl Rove thinks the next for years are destined for bad things, and is purposely trying to throw the election to the Democrats. That's fine with me. Barack rocks!

addendum: Sarah Louise HEATH Palin anagrams to 

'A euthanasia hellish pro'.

That makes me think of her putting a moose out of it's misery.

SWBP: Deforestation

SWBP is Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems, a book I'm reading;
2007, edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Ch. 7: Deforestation, pp. 125-142, is written by Hank Folmer and G. Cornelis Van Kooten, with a shout out to Canada's Sustainable Forest Mgmt. Network.

Saruman said to "Rip them down!" (but he was actually a servant of Sauron)

Deforestation is the loss of forested area, to logging and agriculture (the human causes), or to natural means like fire and disease. Logging, contrary to popular belief, is not the major factor (it's only between 2-10%). Agricultural conversion is.

The chapter has a table that shows deforestation patterns across the planet between 1980-2005. Deforestation is mainly a tropical forest problem, between 23 degrees north and south of the equator. Boreal and temperate forests have actually increased in size. But overall, total forest area is decreasing, with Africa, Brazil, and Indonesia leading the way, although the rate of world deforestation is declining.

To quote Bjorn, "During the '90's there was a continuing steady loss of tropical forests: the decline was about 0.5 percent annually. The current rate of loss means that forests overall are not in any immediate danger, and, of course, regeneration is possible in time."

The authors say, "Even at the current rate of tropical deforestation, the world's tropical forests would continue to exist throughout the 21st century, and well into the 22nd century."

I would hope they would be with us always.

They note that tropical rainforest, of most concern to the international community, experiences relatively slower rates of deforestation than other tropical forest, and the highest rates of tropical deforestation occur in (moist or dry) upland forest.

Anyway, between 1990 to 2000 the world lost 9,397,000 hectares, and between 2000 and 2005 lost 7,317,000 hectares of forest, according to the UN's Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). This is similar to the large-scale temperate deforestation that has already occurred centuries ago in many regions of Europe and North America, for fuel, construction, and agriculture.

Doesn't this statistic make the people tree-sitting or chaining themselves to trees seem kind of silly? (But if you fell a tree, does it not sap?)

Did you know that wood matter is produced by plants from matter in the AIR, not the ground?

Okay, maybe I'm getting off topic. The chapter attempts to weigh the costs and benefits of deforestation, and propose solutions. It's not cut and dry, so to speak.

Forests have 1.timber and other products (production functions), 2.carbon sink and watershed utility (regulatory functions), and 3.the wildlife habitat/biodiversity function. Regulatory functions also include things like waste assimilation, soil conservation, etc. which do not have prices attached to them (easily, anyway). Non-market valuation is necessary, they propose.

All the (listed/described) factors that need to be taken into account are: value per hectare: clearfelling or sustainable selective logging (clearcutting does not usually occur, but if so, what percent is usable), "stumpage" prices, mgmt. costs, site conditions, productivity, and, especially, subsequent use of the land, such as artificially generated stands or managed plantations. Whether the land is used temporarily, and left fallow to revert back to forest, or used for permanent or semi-permanent agriculture, depends on ag prices, conversion subsidies, access roads, population pressure, and lack of tenure security, with variable significance. Soil-erosion/nutrient loss vs. use that provides crop-cover all year long is a big deal. The value of small-scale gathering of things like rattan, oils, fruits, nuts, and bushmeat, can be large at some times and places. There's eco-tourism, too. As many as possibly 16 million species go extinct in tropical forests every year. Illegal logging is widespread. The relation of income to deforestation has been studied, with the conclusion that it's complex and ambiguous. Factors differ in different places, and the definition of deforestation is variable in different studies, too. And CO2.

They use the term "forest regret" which is not explained. I have no idea what it means.

He lists 10 forms of policy failure in regards to forests (deforestation PLUS reduced welfare of society): 1. direct subsidies to fell forest, 2. indirect subsidies that encourage timber companies to harvest excessively, while failing to capture true costs, 3. creation and protection of an inefficient (log-wasting) forest-industry, 4. subsidies to cattle ranchers for foreign exchange, 5. tax credits, 6. exemption of ag income from taxation, 7. subsidized credit for agriculture, 8. rules on public land allocation that favor large land holders or require 'development' of land to demonstrate ownership, 9. access roads, 10. overpopulation and migration policies.

Of note: the value of forest soils for agriculture is often overstated, resulting in quick depletion from wrong crops. Peasants are encouraged to move to forest, so governments can avoid dealing with social unrest in cities. Politically powerless social groups cannot advocate for the protection of undervalued minor forest products. In the interests of economic growth and development, forests might not be seen as an essential resource, and may even be seen as an asset to be liquidated. Illegal logging is rampant in the absence of an honest and well-functioning court system, and corrupt politicians who use govt. property to benefit their supporters at the expense of the population, and, in general, a state that transparently forms policy, and has the legitimacy to make painful decisions.

There are some big remaining unanswered questions, like what is the potential cost of CO2, with the absence of forest? Deforestation may have a net benefit of around 22B USD (dollars) a year, but might also have the potential to damage global welfare by around 126B dollars, the chapter says. Because developing countries are given no, or inadequate, compensation for the CO2 released by their deforestation activities, CO2 does not enter into their decision calculus.

Global warming has a tipping point, so anti-deforestation efforts become increasingly more valuable/important. The chapter says, "It is clear that, in the absence of massive global transfers to tropical nations to encourage them to preserve forests (e.g. Kyoto's Clean Development Mechanism), deforestation will likely continue."

Market failure might be less of a factor than policy failures, in which govt. interventions encourage deforestation. While we can't assign numbers, the benefits of preventing deforestation outweigh the costs. The World Bank, and the international community, can play an important role in inducing changes in specific countries' harmful policies.

SWBP: Climate Change

SWBP: Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems, 2007
a book I'm reading, edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Copenhagen Consensus Center

I've already written a long article on global warming;
I tried to merge as many varying sources on the subject as I could.
Chapter 6, Climate Change, written by Gary Yohe, adding to the subject.

Is it getting hot in here, or is it just me?

Poor developing countries are most vulnerable.

The chapter has a chart for effects in the categories of water, food, health, land, and environment for each degree increase in average temperature (since 1990, I believe). They are: (1 degree)glacier disappearance threatening water supplies for 50M people, 300,000 people would die from climate-related diseases (malaria, diarrhea, and malnutrition), thawing permafrost would damage roads and buildings in parts of Canada and Russia, 10% of land species could face extinction,

(2 degrees) potentially 20-30% decrease in water availability in Southern Africa and the Mediterranean, sharp declines in crop yield in tropical regions, 40-60 million more people exposed to malaria in Africa, up to 10 million more people affected by coastal flooding each year, 15-40% of species facing extinction,

(3 degrees) serious droughts once every ten years for southern europe, 1-4B more people suffer water shortages, while 1-5B gain water, increasing flood risk, 150-550 additional millions at risk of hunger, and 1-3 million more dying from malnutrition, if carbon fertilization is weak, and 1-170 million more people affected by coastal flooding each year. Also, 20-50% of species would face extinction, including 25-60% of mammals, 30-40% of birds, and a possible onset of Amazon forest collapse (according to some models).

(4 degrees) potential 30-50% decrease in water availability in Southern Africa and the mediterranean, agricultural yields potentially decline by 15-35% in Africa/parts of Australia, e.g., up to 80M more people exposed to malaria, 7-300M more people affected by coastal flooding each year, and around half of the world's nature reserves fail.

(5 degrees) possible disappearance of large Himalayan glaciers, affecting one quarter of China's population and hundreds of millions in India, continued oceanic acidity increases would disrupt marine ecosystems and fish stocks, sea level rise would impact NY, London, Tokyo, Florida, and small islands.

The latest science suggests the earth's average temperature will rise by even more than 5 or 6 degrees, resulting in massive large-scale movements of population, which the author warns could be catastrophic. This degree of change is comparable to what happened between the last ice age and today.

To be fair, there are some benefits/plus's/upsides, surprisingly.

In a survey of the over 100 estimates of the social cost of carbon, a tonne of carbon ranges in social cost from a median of 13 dollars, a mean of 43 dollars, up to 350 dollars. The author of the survey, and another expert, a geographer, agree that 50 bucks per ton is representative of the lowest reasonable estimate of the true social cost of carbon. A fifty buck tax per ton would be something like adding 5 bucks to the price of a barrel of oil.

But over the long term, this would not work. The interest rate would demand a 2-3% increase per year. This is the only way to give the policy traction, he says.

SWBP: Air Pollution

SWBP is a 2007 book I'm reading, edited by Bjorn Lomborg, director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center; Chapter 5: Air Pollution, is authored/addressed by Guy Hutton of DSI (Development Solutions International). He is my favorite author of the book so far, I think, in directness of style. Summary and Commentary:

Cough. Who farted.

Air pollution is largely (mostly?) due to human activity, from combustion of fuels. Specifically, the combustion of fuels for transportation, energy generation, energy-intensive industrial operations, resource extraction and processing industries, and domestic cooking and heating, among others. Tobacco smoke is another one, which I have previously written about (see Barack Smokes, why he shouldn't).

The problem with Air Pollution, indoor and outdoor, is a) indoor cooking fires with solid/biomass fuel kill 1.5 million people every year (the majority in children under 5), and b) outdoor pollution, particularly in Asia, may result in about half that number of deaths. In addition to human and animal health, buildings and materials, crops, and visibility are affected. Aside from the deaths, there are countless million more episodes of illness. Cough.

I imagine it's like smoking, in a way, in that it shortens life expectancy, which I assume is what they factor into the above mortality statistics. I wonder how they do that. Because, obviously, outdoor air pollution isn't like a bullet to the brain. But it can be just as deadly. Mr. Hutton explains that scientific medical controlled trials on air pollution are inadequate and necessary. This is because there are many pollutants with different, hard to discern, health-effects.

It's been in the news lately with the Beijing Olympics.

quotes
Indoor- "The total disease burden, including morbidity, is estimated at 38.5 million Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs)." Indoor cooking fires in rural areas mainly use firewood, dung, other agricultural residues, followed by charcoal and coal/lignite. 38.5M years. Geez.

Outdoor-"According to the World Health Organization, PM concentrations in urban outdoor air from industries and vehicles may trigger some 800,000 premature deaths a year with 65% occurring in the developing countries of Asia." (Is PM parts per million?)

Forest fires, and events like Bhopal (chemicals) or Chernobyl (radioactivity) are part of the problem. Air pollution, defined, is suspended particulate matter (dust, fumes, mist, and smoke), gaseous pollutants, and odor. Indoor and outdoor pollution, combined, are estimated to cause 2.5 million deaths a year. This killer lurks and lives in the home, in the workplace, and in the urban environment. The quality of life, as well as economic consequences, make air pollution control programs highly cost-beneficial.

The benefit-cost ratio, though hard to pin down, is estimated between 0.5 (the lower Shanghai estimate) to 13.0 (the higher U.S. Federal regulations estimate). Even aside from the silly numbers (unless you're an investor), 1.visibility, 2. ecology (crop damage and wildlife effects from acid deposition), and, of course, 3.health (often acute lower respiratory infections in children and COPD -chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- in adults, among the 3 billion people who depend on solid fuels for cooking fires), make this an obvious priority.

SWBP: Subsidies and Trade Barriers

SWBP as I call it, Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems, is a book I'm reading; 2007, Edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, Chapter 4: Subsidies and Trade Barriers, written and solved by Kym Anderson, from the University of Adelaide and the World Bank. Big money, big money! Summary and Commentary:

Tear down the wall

The gist is that government intervention in markets causes harm. The brunt of which is carried by the poor. It's a no-brainer. The benefits of completely removing all trade barriers would be between 67 and 260 times the costs. No trade or agricultural barriers would result in benefits estimated to reach 287B US dollars a year. Include services, and the benefit goes up to 2.4T US dollars. That's T as in Trillion.

Cushioning the blow for those who lose their jobs would be a short-term headache, but the boost to economic growth would soon create many new jobs.

Such widely distributed prosperity makes trade liberalization a high priority, in Mrs. (?) Anderson's view. The distortionary policies in agriculture and clothing, in particular, are especially harmful to the world's poor. My whole religious sensibility is centered around lifting poor people from struggle, misery, and want. This one should be easy, once the world's policy makers are educated, with solid data from the past, as well as the theoretical model, of why liberalization works. Liberal is not a dirty word, you know. With a potential payoff of 260 dollars for every dollar spent, the political will for creating completely free trade should be ample. Even 67:1 is a mighty good deal.

SWBP: Money Laundering

Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems, a book I'm reading;
2007, Edited by Bjorn Lomborg; Chapter 3: Money Laundering
Problem addressed/Chapter authored by: Donato Masciandaro

Summary and Commentary:

Competitors, keep it clean! No blows below the belt!

ML, as the chapter calls it, is the criminal practice of engaging in financial transactions in order to conceal the identity, source, and/or destination of money, by colluding intermediaries or lax intermediaries ("honest but inefficient in protecting their integrity") in offshore financial centers (OFC's) and the banking and financial industry. It responds to the overall demand for "black" financial services expressed by individuals or groups that have committed income-producing crimes. It can act as a multiplier of illegal revenues. It is "a rather complex operation."

It is different from the financing of terrorism, which is "money dirtying."

Estimates of the amount of laundered money, globally, range from 2-32% of total world GDP. In 2005, 1.038 trillion dollars are estimated to have been laundered, from the drug trade alone. Total GDP now is something like 47T dollars, so 32 percent of that is 15.54 trillion dollars. Wow.
Masciandaro puts the estimate at 3.8T, or 9% of the world economy.

If this were like Robin Hood, or the Lottery, or maybe even Native American casinos, where the money flowed to the poor or for education or a historically disadvantaged group, maybe it wouldn't be much of a problem. And I guess we don't actually know. But the author makes the assumption that it's a public bad, taking a conservative view, and uses some research and an equation with some baseline assumptions to show that reducing the multiplier effect through anti-money-laundering regulations will result in the cost of money-laundering going up from 25% to 60%. He admits his proposal is based on the modern theory of financial regulation, not the traditional theory of regulation, in which regulatory effort can be either irrelevant or unproductive.

In short, he calculates a benefit/cost ratio of 3.16. The cost cannot exceed the total value of world banking profits, which in 2004 was 0.53 trillion US dollars.

He points out some realities: Some countries are predisposed to adopting lax regulations because the externalities of criminal activity do not affect them. The future in addressing this issue revolves around two things: Information and Incentives. There are 4 categories of actors on this issue: Bankers/the public, Criminals, Policy-makers, and Losers (those who bear the costs of black money). I'm not sure why he lumps bankers and the public together. Getting a firmer grip on the real Benefits and Costs of this issue seems necessary.

It became more of an issue after 9-11. It'll be interesting to see what happens.

SWBP: Lack of Intellectual Property Rights

SWBP is Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems; a book I'm reading
This 2007 book is edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Director of The Copenhagen Consensus Center. It addresses 23 global issues; Lack of Intellectual Property Rights is chapter 2, authored (and solved) by Keith E. Maskus, University of Colorado. Summary and Commentary:

Gee, I guess it's a good thing I'm adding my own commentary, I think..hmm.

The problem, defined: The ability and willingness of around 150 country's governments to enforce patents, copyrights, trademarks, plant variety rights, certification marks, and geographical indications are almost completely absent, with consequences ranging from 1)the lethal (fake pharmaceuticals) to 2)limiting the ability of entrepeneurs and artists to create and sell new products (In Indonesia, evidence suggests that up to 4-5% of the population find it difficult to escape poverty because of this), to 3) the reluctance of international firms to provide such products as new medicines, vaccines, or agricultural technologies, in the absence of exclusive marketing rights, and finally, to 4) the deterrence of FDI (foreign direct investment) (which may reduce GDP growth by .1-.25 percentage points in larger developing countries).

It's part of the larger problem of a weak regulatory environment, as an indicator of a business climate that discourages innovation and FDI.

Solving this problem would mean better healthcare, more innovation, and job creation. There are two solutions. The cost-benefit analysis indicates that a total cost of 3.5 - 4.1 billion dollars for the first solution would return benefits between 2.4 - 5.2 times greater. And the second solution, at a cost of 6 billion dollars, would return an estimated 9 times the benefit.

What are the solutions?

The first is to improve intellectual property regulations and their enforcement.
The second is to encourage companies in developing economies to protect their own IPR (intellectual property rights) with financial and technical assistance.

The most important aspect of the second solution for the author is to have developing economy students study IPR in industrialized countries. Training 10,000 students would cost $200 million per year, but would return between 8.96-9.17 times the benefit.

Aside: "One person estimates that products developed from traditional knowledge and sold internationally could amount to 50-100 billion dollars a year if suitable marketing and IP protection channels were found."

Development is where the money's at, y'all.

Does all intellectual property emanate from, and therefore belong to, God? No comment.
Glad to be of service, though.

Actually, doesn't someone own the rights to the bible, now that I think about it? Ha. Nuts.

SWBP: Financial Instability

SWBP is Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems;
A 2007 book edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center
The first chapter; first of 23 discussed global problems:
Financial Instability
Each chapter is written by a different author/specialist;
Peter Blair Henry from Stanford authors this topic/proposes a solution:

If Jesus is the answer: Male anger in a stable? (manger, get it?)
Moderation in all things (including moderation?)...
I say open all markets, and really go for true value, with REALLY strong policy guiding society (humanity, I mean) toward HAPPINESS, primarily. Does that help, lol? Actually, can we make the animals happier, too?

First off, fyi, there's a distinction between the words 'economic' and 'financial'
Economic means:
Financial means:
(Fyi means 'for your information', fyi).

Financial Instability is when the graph of a country's growth over time gets jumpy, I believe. And by jumpy, I mean going negative (otherwise it wouldn't be a problem).
The chapter doesn't say this. Maybe I'm wrong. In any case,

The book just refers to "financial crises," which come in 3 forms and have 4 solutions. (forms: banking crises, currency crises, and combinations of both) (solutions: reregulation of domestic financial markets (for banking crises), reimposition of capital controls (for currency crises), a single world currency, and engineering an international financial solution.

He seems to think a world currency is a hopeless and unachievable objective; I think the case just needs to be made that it's in everybody's self-interest. Challenge to economists: How great would the reward be?? Let's Do It! (The chapter says for a 16 billion dollar cost, the world would reap a 107 billion dollar benefit).

I read the chapter and I don't actually know what these banking crises, or currency crises, might in actuality be; but I DO know that they are calculated to cost more than 1% of economic growth/9% of economic output, which is no small sum, especially that the economic devastation happens in developing countries whose ability to care for their most vulnerable citizens is reduced. They happen an average of once every 12 years. The solution to this problem is amazing; for an estimated 0.5 billion dollars annually, the annual gross benefits could be over 150 billion dollars (!).

What's the solution?

It's "Build developing nations' capacity to design and implement institutional reforms that are suited to their own circumstances." Geez. I coulda thought of that. Sounds simple enough. But the beauty of this book is it assigns economic values to various solutions, so you can get a handle on what might be the best option(s). They're only guestimates, though.

Policy-reforms and institution-development in developing countries need to be done in their local contexts (all politics is local, he says), so enabling the training of domestically skilled people by providing funds would increase productivity and reduce the incidence of financial crises.

I remember this solution from back during my time at Davis. We think we're superior, in so many ways, and that we therefore need to solve developing countries' problems for them. The empowering solution is thought to be to provide enough capital for domestic citizens to get local institutions on their feet, to solve their own problems the most creatively. "Engineering an international financial solution" would be a hubristic exercise in over-generality, seems to be what he is saying. In other words, the "international" solution is national, or perhaps at even smaller levels.

I would add that we should erase the country mindset, however, anyway, and people anywhere should be open to ideas from anywhere else. Ideas know no borders, but I would agree that it is probably far more likely to have the best ideas for development coming from the developing regions themselves. In this case, it's a matter of adapting the well-developed financial institutions throughout the world -a product of trial and error- to local conditions and circumstance.

Bjorn says solving this problem could even lead to better overall governance and faith in public institutions.

Piddlip is Bad

Ha. To explain:

Piddlip is an acronym I made up, which spells out:

1.Pain/suffering, Immorality (sin), Disease, Death, Lies, Ignorance, and Poverty.

Conversely,
2.Feeling good and happy, Service (compassion, caring, loving-kindness, action), Health, Life, Truth, Knowledge, and Comfort are GOOD.

(That has no vowels to facilitate an acronym -sorry).
(Also: Of course, as I have learned, lies can be a way to access the truth. A word to the wise.)

Range of Human States

(In English: Other languages may be more -or less- nuanced):

States of Being:
On Misery-Bliss scale (Negative, Neutral, Positive)

Physical- Mental

Negative/Suffering (3 levels)
1.Agony Torment
2.Pain Anguish/Misery
Hopelessness/Despair
3.Discomfort Malaise/Unease/Discontent

Neutral/Lack of Suffering (Neither Suffering nor Joy)
4.Health + Simply Being (IS a Positive; 6 levels)

Positive/Happiness or Pleasure
5.Comfort Satisfaction
6.Happiness.......Define for yourself *
7. Joy, Laughter
8.Ecstasy Bliss
9. Nirvana

*I define happiness a lack of suffering, which means health, wellness, PLUS any of the following: sensual pleasure/hedonism (sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touch; e.g. good meals, good music, good sex, a good book, a comfortable chair, a massage, sounds of laughter or nature, warmth of sun by pool, good music or conversation, a fun movie), a feeling of peace tranquility and calm, a feeling of job well done/accomplishment, helping others, fitness endorphins, and learning (especially to questions I've previously had).

Some Questions on My Mind

Obviously, I'm not Omniscient:

1) Who invented the concept of angels?
2) Are Rome, the Roma, Romania, and Amor all linguistically related?
3) What's with numbers and words? (e.g. won, to, three/there/h-tree, for, i've f, sicks, S-even (how odd), ate, h-eight, ninny, etc.)
4) What is it that shakes a light wave?
5) If space can fold in on itself, what is space? Should we go back to the "ether" concept? Is there no such thing as "void"?
6) Could the really small be linked to the really large? Could you be shrunk to the size of a universe?
7) Where does stuff sucked into black holes go?
8) How can you free your mind if you're a captive audience? Can telepathy be legislated about? Should unwanted voice(s) be made illegal? Can they? How would that be enforced? Can we really talk about a right to privacy when our own heads aren't private?
9) Are years getting incrementally shorter or longer (by even a small fraction of a second)? Is the earth speeding up or slowing down? Getting closer or further from the sun?
10) Is evil just biological?
11) Could I be born-again as a leach?
12) Could Osama Bin Laden be/have been under a U.S. citizen's mind control?
13) If quantum foam experiences time differently, does it have a range?
14) Are dreams ever out of body experiences?
15) Can all drug experiences be replicated by natural body chemistry?
16) Could we genetically design a plant-animal? A solar powered animal..
17) Are the undersea vent-creatures genetically linked to us, or did they arise independently?
18) What's your list of questions? Maybe a question a day is all I ask.

Joe Biden

His name anagrams to 'Be Joined'

I like him. Straight shooter, as they say, I think.
Joe Biden, Wikipedia; link

MIT's 3W IDD Summit

3W is my shorthand for Third World.
IDD is International Development and Design:

The Christian Science Monitor had this video today; link.

For instructions on how to build this year's, and past year's, devices, go to:
http://www.iddsummit.org/

At least, I assume the summit site will be able to give you some help.
I hope I don't make an ass/(of) u/me.

They should make their link better and include instructions to all year's devices, in my opinion.
And maybe include links to sand filter instructions, etc.. as a general resource for when the underdeveloped world really makes it's presence on the web, in the near future, I imagine.

Wikipedia Teshara references

Earlier I referred to all the Gods in my name; I found more.
I'll give Wikipedia links to all the strange embedded meanings in my surname, Teshara:

Te, Tes, Tesh, Tesha, Teshar,
Eshara, Shara, Hara, Ara, Ra
Es, Esh, Esha, Eshar, (e-share)
Sh, Sha, Shar
Har, Ar, Ha

Earth, Heart, Art, Has, Sara, As, Ash, Set, Hater, Hate
Hear, Hare, Tear, Rate, Tare, Erat (word), Erat (person)
Saar, Haas, Rah, Seth, Rash,
Hat, Rat, Sat, Tah, Tar, Tas,
Tea, Ate, Eta, Eat, Ear, Are, Era, Rea, Rae,
Ert, Ret, Ter, Sea, Heat,
Asa, Sar, Aha, Ser, Asha, Arah, Het, Shet, Tas, Tash, The,
Hr, Rh, Sr, Ts, St, Th, Ht, Tr, Rt, Er, Tr, Rt, Ta, At, Et, Ta,
Eh, He, Se, Hs, Aa, Ae, Ea,
Haat, Hata, Taha, Aath, Thaa, Atha, Athar, Athas, Athares, Atar,
etc.

Ararat

My Activity Paradigm

Ooh, I make it sound fancy, don't I?
I am alone much of the time, so I have put some thought into how to wisely spend my time.
To be healthy, you need to keep busy, so this is what I do:

I think we all pretty much do 10 things around the house:
In 3 categories: input, output, and biological:

Input: Watch, Read, Listen
Output: Write, Talk, Create
Biological: Sleep, Eat, Exercise

The tenth thing is Work. Which, for me, is chores around the house, or gardening..
Sleep includes things like Meditate, Sit, and Nap
Eat includes Drink (I could have said Ingest). I include Cook with this, of course.

Listen

-Listen is anything Audio: Speech or Music.

-Speech could be talk radio, television in the background or over my wireless headphones, books on tape, lectures or presentations or readings of whatever length online (i.e. ted lectures, u-tube, or learning out loud), telephone recordings, and, of course, actual conversation over the phone (which I hardly ever do).

-Music could be cd's, tapes, am or fm radio, radio on tv, radio online, satellite radio.

Input categories
(by what device -of 7?- you're interacting with): computer, tv, radio, stereo, phone
Read: Book or Magazine; computer

Watch: TV, Computer
Listen: Radio, Stereo; computer, phone

(by your 5 senses):
See, hear, smell, taste, touch.
Feeling and Intuition are the 6th sense.
The internal sense of vibes or spirit or voice(s) or whatever.
So just flip through the list in your mind and decide which sense you want to engage.

-unless you want to output (write, talk, create) or bio (eat, exercise, sleep)

so, to be stupid,

So 'whirl, world trade center, see' is a way of thinking of WRL, WTC, SEE.

in the I owe bee (iob -input, output, biological).

maybe it's boy, see the wtc whirl.  (boi, see wtc wrl)

for the 9 things to do round the house.

Aside:
I'm a very visual and spatial person. I am constantly imagining myself interacting with the things around me, as I walk through the house. In this way, I see the potential for all the possible activities I can do in each room I'm in. If you're bored, then you're boring. There's always more than enough to do. Busy, busy as Bokonon says. You couldn't pay me enough to sit around and twiddle my thumbs wasting time in an office. Or play videogames. I've recently decided to do some push-ups every time I go into a new room. I don't like videogames that much. I used to have an atari as a kid, though. I liked kaboom. I wanted to learn how to program it, but my teacher told me to figure it out myself, so my computer-programming career ended there, in 7th grade, in '84.  If you're in action mode, just do whatever you see needs to be done, until everything that can be done is.  ANYway,

I've got all these buttons on my toolbar, which give me all my routine online options at a glance. Pretty cool. And I don't have to type in the webpage addresses.

For some reason, I'm not as excited about my book I'm working on. My wife's book collection and music collection is a continual possibility for exploration. People aren't reading anymore. I used to love to read. I need to get back into it, with real, actual, physical, books.

Okay, have a nice day!
-Jess

Ashrita Furman

Along with that pic of John Terilli (posted earlier, under 'JT Universes'), I have two other pics of healthy people I want to lose my gut to hopefully look like, throughout my lifetime:

Ashrita Furman and x. (I'm looking for his name and pic)

I saw Ashrita in the Guinness Book of World Records, and I thought to myself, he looks good, I want to look like that. It's practical athleticism, not just for looks... By now, he's set like 100 records. He's always looking to conquor something else. He studied under Sri Chinmoy, who he mentions in this abc interview. I imagine all these goals he strives for keeps him focused, as well as in tip-top shape.

There's something -everything- to be said for supreme focus, and keeping oneself challenged, and developing one's potential to the utmost, and setting an example...

A few cool articles on fitness psychology:
1.Neurosis and fitness
2.Body building with a heart.

Bodybuilding, defined, is performing different exercises for each body part -for muscle hypertrophy, symmetry, and balance. (hypertrophy means size).

Aikido Diplomacy

The founder of aikido, Morihei Ueshiba, declared:
"To control aggression without inflicting injury is the Art of Peace."

Some brainstorming on international conflict resolution:
1) Healthy leaders. I cringe at chubby or overweight or even obese leaders, with greasy complexions. They should feel good, with lots of happy endorphins in them. They should feel peaceful, and not angry or stressed, to help act accordingly.

2) Boxing and martial arts clubs everywhere, available to everyone. Frustration and aggression are a natural part of life, that should be channeled into creative, healthy, athletic endeavor. Inflicting injury, however, usually doesn't help things, so people have to know what they're getting into, and mutually agree to the risk. Clear rules for winning and losing should deter urges for violent retaliation. Peaceful philosophies in tandem with athletic self-control should create sane and happy lifestyles.

Ueshiba's goal was to create an art that practitioners could use to defend themselves while also protecting their attacker from injury.

Aikido is performed by blending with the motion of the attacker and redirecting the force of the attack rather than opposing it head-on.

On Knowledge

A few aphorisms I've collected:

1. The more you know, the more you know you don't know. -?

2. Ignorance is bless -?; In knowledge is suffering -bible.

3. The first step to knowing something is having a word for it.

4. KWUTEO: Knowledge, Wisdom, Understanding, Truth, Enlightenment, Omniscience.
(I made this word up).

The Foundation of All Good Qualities

I just finished this free Buddhist 82 pg. book, by Geshe Tsultim Gyeltsen

His website is http://www.tdling.com/.

Wondering about the title? The foundation of all good qualities is....
The Kind Guru!

That's it.

p.s. Did you know that guru is the Zimbabwean name for tripe?

Just War Theory

Just in the sense of justice, not "mere"

the Catechism of the Catholic Church, in paragraph 2309, lists four strict conditions for "legitimate defence by military force":

1.the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;

2.all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;

3.there must be serious prospects of success;

4.the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.

What does God think of this?
Let me tell you what I, God, thinks: Bullshit. Soldiers are not Buddhas. People have a right to defend themselves, of course, but the best way out of a conflict might just be to give in. Turn the other cheek. If you're willing to die, no one's stopping you, of course. War is messy, and although leaders may think they are fully justified in entering a war, jus in bellum (just conduct in war) is basically impossible, I would have to say. In other words, people get kill crazy. But they should be Buddhas. Peaceful, kind, compassionate, loving, friendly, happy, helpful, wise, etc.

Here's what John Kerry said, after his participation in Vietnam:
Asked whether he had personally committed atrocities in Vietnam, he responded:

"There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50 calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."

I have an even higher standard than Geneva or U.S. law: Thou shalt not kill.

Only time should kill. Who can say where the road goes? Only time.
There's time-life books. There's also time of death. When you're number's up. As Pink Floyd sang, "shorter of breath, and one day closer to death." Is it fated, people wonder. Nah. You can move your number around. You do that by moving your body around.

As for military defense, murder is always wrong. So just give up, already. Outlaw all militaries, for Christ sakes. Can't we all just get along? Let conflict be interpersonal. Nations are artificial constructs. They don't even exist. There are borders with laws and citizens and pr machines that create identity, in addition to culture, religion, language, which usually transcends borders. But everybody is just PEOPLE. Enough already with the stupid false identities, jingoism, and nationalistic fervor. Get real. Get human.

Not that countries are bad. I mean, why not. But nobody wants to get killed, so I've got to step in as Dad and stop all this stupid squabbling amidst my children. Alright? Now, go to your room.

As for killing plants and slaughterhouses for your carnivorous appetites, well you gotta do what you gotta do. But you don't need to go to war. That's obvious.

Consistent Life Ethic

Submitted post on Consistent Life Ethic website:

"I have always wondered why the Catholic Church takes such a strong stand on abortion, justifying the stand as protecting the soul of the unborn, yet they take no public stand on catholics killing others in military combat, an action that is clearly in violation of Jesus teachings. I have been asking that question since the end of the Vietnam War. Mostly I get dismissed with "I'll have to ask ___, come back later. One priest used "papal infallibility" as the justification. One priest stated that the Vatican is afraid their public image would suffer severely if they took a stand that would prohibit catholics around the world from engaging in military combat for conscientious reasons. Some admitted that the Vatican silence on this issue made NO sense to them. There is a line in one (or more) of the catechisms that states something like "anyone who knowing supports actions of another that are in conflict with the teachings of the church authority is equally guilty of ..." or something like that. The church teaches that killing is a sin, it is part of our deposit of faith. Why has the magisterium NOT addressed this issue?"

Ok, I'm going to weigh in, here (I weigh 205, lol)

(I don't believe in souls. At least not in the sense of a non-physical identity that inhabits our bodies and migrates elsewhere upon death. The JW's say it was originally a word that meant our bodies, which is the only way I give the term truth/meaning. But maybe there is a reality that corresponds to the funkier understanding, which I will explain).

There is a theory of Just War in the Catholic doctrine. God is a man of war, the old testament says. Self-defense is acceptable, and the Pope has his security detail/Swiss guards, of which I cannot say if they are authorized to use lethal force. I would assume they would try to avoid killing an assassin, if possible. In any case, almost everybody kills spiders or whatnot in their homes, although the truly compassionate attitude of loving-kindness should probably facilitate nonviolence to even the smallest or deadliest of animals, if possible. Vegetarianism figures into this, as well. But, since we're talking about not taking life...well plants are living things, too. And we've got to eat. Some believe, including scientists, that all matter has consciousness, such as the water depicted in the movie what the bleep do we know. An honest look at ourselves shows that we are things, like any other thing, such as a robot, albeit designed by eons of evolution instead of a human engineer during a single lifetime. Didn't Jesus say he was a rock?

This brings up the question, what is the difference between life and consciousness? And is death merely a change in form? What is a unit of consciousness? We perceive distinction, but perhaps everything is One, as they say, that unity being termed God, which you are a part of, whether you believe it or not, recognize it or not, or call it that or not. And death is like becoming the dead skin cells of the God-organism, fallen leaves, that fertilize the soil and create new life to sustain it in the future. We even have a concept of Death, as a living being who kills us. It's all alive. Perhaps even the emptiness, the void, is a kind of form of life. I was just thinking about naming two pet dogs Being and Nothingness. I got a chuckle out of that.

If we believe in prayer, we believe in telepathy, so every thought we have ever had has been heard by someone or something other than ourselves. In fact, the very concept of self is diminished, as we perceive other's thoughts within our own minds. So, "our" ideas live on, and we obtain a kind of immortality of effect in the world, although our bodies and consciousness will cease upon death. Of course, if our consciousness has come from an external source all along, then we can conceivably continue to exist beyond death. If all your thoughts, words, and actions come from "God," i.e. you are only a medium/vessel, or whatnot, for a source, then your memes will persist and your program will propagate, and possibly the detailed personal experience of your life will be added to, even after death, in a machine or the mind of a genius or whatever else, the robots of planet Organon, lol.

This might seem to explain why Catholic doctrine has not forbidden killing, despite it being the xth commandment. We have to kill to eat. Humans are animals. And they wouldn't be very popular if they decreed vegetarianism, or everybody to stop eating plantlife altogether, and sweep in front of them, like the Jains. Cannibalism is obviously not acceptable to any valid, much less universal, moral system -unless it is in the form of a ritual like the Eucharist. Even vegetables. I had a recent thought- what if you knew you were going to die in a week, cut off your legs to feed a starving friend, and somehow both anaesthetized the pain and did heroin until death, so that you felt no pain and actually felt better during your remaining time... Sorry. I know that's not really the happiest thought experiment. It might not be the unhappiest, though, especially if you had achieved your life's goal(s), and left the world a better place than you found it. Anyway, eating the body of Christ might be something like that. Eat a rock. Get your minerals.

Why hello there!

300 words that will get the cia, fbi, and nsa to look at your webpage:

Waihopai, INFOSEC, Information Security, Information Warfare, IW, IS, Priavacy, Information Terrorism, Terrorism Defensive Information, Defense Information Warfare, Offensive Information, Offensive Information Warfare, National Information Infrastructure, InfoSec, Reno, Compsec, Computer Terrorism, Firewalls, Secure Internet Connections, ISS, Passwords, DefCon V, Hackers, Encryption, Espionage, USDOJ, NSA, CIA, S/Key, SSL, FBI, Secert Service, USSS, Defcon, Military, White House, Undercover, NCCS, Mayfly, PGP, PEM, RSA, Perl-RSA, MSNBC, bet, AOL, AOL TOS, CIS, CBOT, AIMSX, STARLAN, 3B2, BITNET, COSMOS, DATTA, E911, FCIC, HTCIA, IACIS, UT/RUS, JANET, JICC, ReMOB, LEETAC, UTU, VNET, BRLO, BZ, CANSLO, CBNRC, CIDA, JAVA, Active X, Compsec 97, LLC, DERA, Mavricks, Meta-hackers, ^?, Steve Case, Tools, Telex, Military Intelligence, Scully, Flame, Infowar, Bubba, Freeh, Archives, Sundevil, jack, Investigation, ISACA, NCSA, spook words, Verisign, Secure, ASIO, Lebed, ICE, NRO, Lexis-Nexis, NSCT, SCIF, FLiR, Lacrosse, Flashbangs, HRT, DIA, USCOI, CID, BOP, FINCEN, FLETC, NIJ, ACC, AFSPC, BMDO, NAVWAN, NRL, RL, NAVWCWPNS, NSWC, USAFA, AHPCRC, ARPA, LABLINK, USACIL, USCG, NRC, ~, CDC, DOE, FMS, HPCC, NTIS, SEL, USCODE, CISE, SIRC, CIM, ISN, DJC, SGC, UNCPCJ, CFC, DREO, CDA, DRA, SHAPE, SACLANT, BECCA, DCJFTF, HALO, HAHO, FKS, 868, GCHQ, DITSA, SORT, AMEMB, NSG, HIC, EDI, SAS, SBS, UDT, GOE, DOE, GEO, Masuda, Forte, AT, GIGN, Exon Shell, CQB, CONUS, CTU, RCMP, GRU, SASR, GSG-9, 22nd SAS, GEOS, EADA, BBE, STEP, Echelon, Dictionary, MD2, MD4, MDA, MYK, 747,777, 767, MI5, 737, MI6, 757, Kh-11, Shayet-13, SADMS, Spetznaz, Recce, 707, CIO, NOCS, Halcon, Duress, RAID, Psyops, grom, D-11, SERT, VIP, ARC, S.E.T. Team, MP5k, DREC, DEVGRP, DF, DSD, FDM, GRU, LRTS, SIGDEV, NACSI, PSAC, PTT, RFI, SIGDASYS, TDM. SUKLO, SUSLO, TELINT, TEXTA. ELF, LF, MF, VHF, UHF, SHF, SASP, WANK, Colonel, domestic disruption, smuggle, 15kg, nitrate, Pretoria, M-14, enigma, Bletchley Park, Clandestine, nkvd, argus, afsatcom, CQB, NVD, Counter Terrorism Security, Rapid Reaction, Corporate Security, Police, sniper, PPS, ASIS, ASLET, TSCM, Security Consulting, High Security, Security Evaluation, Electronic Surveillance, MI-17, Counterterrorism, spies, eavesdropping, debugging, interception, COCOT, rhost, rhosts, SETA, Amherst, Broadside, Capricorn, Gamma, Gorizont, Guppy, Ionosphere, Mole, Keyhole, Kilderkin, Artichoke, Badger, Cornflower, Daisy, Egret, Iris, Hollyhock, Jasmine, Juile, Vinnell, B.D.M.,Sphinx, Stephanie, Reflection, Spoke, Talent, Trump, FX, FXR, IMF, POCSAG, Covert Video, Intiso, r00t, lock picking, Beyond Hope, csystems, passwd, 2600 Magazine, Competitor, EO, Chan, Alouette,executive, Event Security, Mace, Cap-Stun, stakeout, ninja, ASIS, ISA, EOD, Oscor, Merlin, NTT, SL-1, Rolm, TIE, Tie-fighter, PBX, SLI, NTT, MSCJ, MIT, 69, RIT, Time, MSEE, Cable & Wireless, CSE, Embassy, ETA, Porno, Fax, finks, Fax encryption, white noise, pink noise, CRA, M.P.R.I., top secret, Mossberg, 50BMG, Macintosh Security, Macintosh Internet Security, Macintosh Firewalls, Unix Security, VIP Protection, SIG, sweep, Medco, TRD, TDR, sweeping, TELINT, Audiotel, Harvard, 1080H, SWS, Asset, Satellite imagery, force, Cypherpunks, Coderpunks, TRW, remailers, replay, redheads, RX-7, explicit, FLAME, Pornstars, AVN, Playboy, Anonymous, Sex, chaining, codes, Nuclear, 20, subversives, SLIP, toad, fish, data havens, unix, c, a, b, d, the, Elvis, quiche, DES, 1*, NATIA, NATOA, sneakers, counterintelligence, industrial espionage, PI, TSCI, industrial intelligence, H.N.P., Juiliett Class Submarine, Locks, loch, Ingram Mac-10, sigvoice, ssa, E.O.D., SEMTEX, penrep, racal, OTP, OSS, Blowpipe, CCS, GSA, Kilo Class, squib, primacord, RSP, Becker, Nerd, fangs, Austin, Comirex, GPMG, Speakeasy, humint, GEODSS, SORO, M5, ANC, zone, SBI, DSS, S.A.I.C., Minox, Keyhole, SAR, Rand Corporation, Wackenhutt, EO, Wackendude, mol, Hillal, GGL, CTU, botux, Virii, CCC, Blacklisted 411, Internet Underground, XS4ALL, Retinal Fetish, Fetish, Yobie, CTP, CATO, Phon-e, Chicago Posse, l0ck, spook keywords, PLA, TDYC, W3, CUD, CdC, Weekly World News, Zen, World Domination, Dead, GRU, M72750, Salsa, 7, Blowfish, Gorelick, Glock, Ft. Meade, press-release, Indigo, wire transfer, e-cash, Bubba the Love Sponge, Digicash, zip, SWAT, Ortega, PPP, crypto-anarchy, AT&T, SGI, SUN, MCI, Blacknet, Middleman, KLM, Blackbird, plutonium, Texas, jihad, SDI, Uzi, Fort Meade, supercomputer, bullion, 3, Blackmednet, Propaganda, ABC, Satellite phones, Planet-1, cryptanalysis, nuclear, FBI, Panama, fissionable, Sears Tower, NORAD, Delta Force, SEAL, virtual, Dolch, secure shell, screws, Black-Ops, Area51, SABC, basement, data-haven, black-bag, TEMPSET, Goodwin, rebels, ID, MD5, IDEA, garbage, market, beef, Stego, unclassified, utopia, orthodox, Alica, SHA, Global, gorilla, Bob, Pseudonyms, MITM, Gray Data, VLSI, mega, Leitrim, Yakima, Sugar Grove, Cowboy, Gist, 8182, Gatt, Platform, 1911, Geraldton, UKUSA, veggie, 3848, Morwenstow, Consul, Oratory, Pine Gap, Menwith, Mantis, DSD, BVD, 1984, Flintlock, cybercash, government, hate, speedbump, illuminati, president, freedom, cocaine, $, Roswell, ESN, COS, E.T., credit card, b9, fraud, assasinate, virus, anarchy, rogue, mailbomb, 888, Chelsea, 1997, Whitewater, MOD, York, plutonium, William Gates, clone, BATF, SGDN, Nike, Atlas, Delta, TWA, Kiwi, PGP 2.6.2., PGP 5.0i, PGP 5.1, siliconpimp, Lynch, 414, Face, Pixar, IRIDF, eternity server, Skytel, Yukon, Templeton, LUK, Cohiba, Soros, Standford, niche, 51, H&K, USP, ^, sardine, bank, EUB, USP, PCS, NRO, Red Cell, Glock 26, snuffle, Patel, package, ISI, INR, INS, IRS, GRU, RUOP, GSS, NSP, SRI, Ronco, Armani, BOSS, Chobetsu, FBIS, BND, SISDE, FSB, BfV, IB, froglegs, JITEM, SADF, advise, TUSA, HoHoCon, SISMI, FIS, MSW, Spyderco, UOP, SSCI, NIMA, MOIS, SVR, SIN, advisors, SAP, OAU, PFS, Aladdin, chameleon man, Hutsul, CESID, Bess, rail gun, Peering, 17, 312, NB, CBM, CTP, Sardine, SBIRS, SGDN, ADIU, DEADBEEF, IDP, IDF, Halibut, SONANGOL, Flu, &, Loin, PGP 5.53, EG&G, AIEWS, AMW, WORM, MP5K-SD, 1071, WINGS, cdi, DynCorp, UXO, Ti, THAAD, package, chosen, PRIME, SURVIAC.

Happy researching!

The Future of Music

The Digital Jukebox and Pandora

I listen to Pandora on my cordless headphones, which allows me to listen outside and in other rooms, and also to the exclusion of tv noise or whatever.

I wish Pandora would play the entire oeuvre (sp?) of the selected artist, however; I have found the my Dead Milkmen's selection has become repetitive. And it plays nothing from a favorite album, Soul Rotation. Anyway,

My wife said she wishes she could get it on her car radio. Pandora is available to cell phones, but I don't know if you can hook your phone up to your car speakers.

My musical availability ranges from the computer (pandora, radio broadcasts online, even u-tube) to the normal radio/stereo in the house or car, to the satellite radio (which we used to get), to the television, which has (on cable) 46 stations. I know there's other options, but what I have keeps me happy. I used to occasionally listen to kdvs radio online. I like Joe Frank.

In Sacramento, I lived near The Beat, and would buy a cd every so often. Now, I'm still exploring my wife's collection.

Anyway, Sara and I discovered a jukebox at a bar yesterday, and I think it would be cool to have like the entirety of all the world's music available like that, either online/cable tv, or for purchase as a machine in your house, or both, for use by a world thirsty for good noise. That way, you could listen to new music for the rest of your life, without repetition. I like variety.

Also, the jukebox could have all the Pandora functions. And it could be voice-command activated, like on Star Trek.

All for now, Jesse

Robots, Russia, and Rivalry

In the News:

I'm pissed. Did Russia really have to invade Georgia during the Olympics? Olympic spirit is supposed to be friendly competition between national representatives, fair and ... well, now that I think about it, maybe fast/furious, too, in addition to controlled precision. It's a healthy form of combat, is all I was thinking. It's a format for the exhibition of possible perfection.

But, yeah, now that I think about it, I can see how a military invasion would be analog to interstate athletic rivalry. Everybody becoming all fervently nationalistic and such. I think the best athletes, no matter what country, should duke it out as individuals who can choose to represent whatever group, if anything, they choose. That's my ideal. The state system seems kind of passe and yesterday, even obsolete, in our present world.

Anyway, in other news, robots are expected to reach human capability by 2029. Wow, huh? Robot for President!

Pandora Radio

I just discovered pandora.com, which, if you don't know, is free online radio, that works by giving you music according to what song or artist you plug in; i.e. similar-sounding music, to broaden your musical exposure (in addition to playing the title artist). I like it alot. I like the Dead Milkmen, Frank Zappa, indie, Alanis kind of stuff (I also have Beatles, The Grateful Dead, 50 Cent, Beatropolis, and my wife has Counting Crows). You can select a mix, and check off the boxes of which stations you want the computer to select from. You can also just pick genre stations, like rock or jazz or whatever.

I've been at my wife's store in Calistoga, Main Element, helping out, lately. I've neglected this blog, perhaps. Life's a long blog, lol. I started another blog, about preparing for fatherhood, which is my next, hopefully, -and lifelong- endeavor. You can read the 3 posts by going to the About Me link.

So, I've been doing store stuff and pandora. Give you a chance to catch up. We've also been watching all the So You Think You Can Dance's on Fox. Congrats, Joshua.

Head Shocks

[edit] "Brain zaps" and "electric shock sensations"

Withdrawal symptoms, in case reports or manufacturer warnings, have been described for serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), as well as atypical agents such as venlafaxine, mirtazapine, trazodone, and duloxetine.[6]

Symptoms described as "brain zaps", "brain shocks," "brain shivers" or "head shocks", are a withdrawal symptom experienced during discontinuation (or reduction of dose) of antidepressant drugs.[7][8] The symptoms are widely variable in description and of unknown etiology;[8] common descriptions include dizziness, electric shock-like sensations, sweating, nausea, insomnia, tremor, confusion, and vertigo.[8][7] The preferred medical terminology for the symptoms is paraesthesia.[9]

In a 1997 survey, a "sizable minority" of medical professionals were not confidently aware of the existence of antidepressant withdrawal symptoms.[10] A 2005 review of adverse event reporting showed that descriptions of "electric shocks" from patients on paroxetine had been reported more frequently than some other symptoms.[9]

I get them. I need them to stop. Ugh.

Psych Labels

From David L. Rosenhan's Being Insane in Insane Places:

"A psychiatric label has a life and an influence of its own. Once the impression has been formed that the patient is schizophrenic, the expectation is that he will continue to be schizophrenic. When a sufficient amount of time has passed, during which the patient has done nothing bizarre, he is considered to be in remission and available for discharge. But the label endures beyond discharge, with the unconfirmed expectation that he will behave as a schizophrenic again. Such labels, conferred by mental health professionals, are as influential on the patient as they are on his relatives and friends, and it should not surprise anyone that the diagnosis acts on all of them as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Eventually, the patient himself accepts the diagnosis, with all of its surplus meanings and expectations, and behaves accordingly."

Now, hold on. I'm doing this God thing for fun.
And I had this voice in my head thing done to me. He can probably do it to you, too.
I suspect if I had never told the doctors my birthmother was schizophrenic, I may never have been so labelled. But I read somewhere that virtually anyone can be made to hear voice(s).
I'm not crazy; I'm supersane. And I'm Jesse.
I was originally diagnosed as bipolar. In the sense that I was normal, with elevation, and back, if there was ever that much variation. I don't chart my moods like that. I certainly don't remember any debilitating lows. I was just happy, basically.
But I had to be diagnosed as sick. I was just too happy, I guess.
Must have been irritating. I suspect that's what a mental illness diagnosis is really about.
Lithium was horrible. I am a telepath. And I deal with my voice in as sane a way as possible. I am no more a threat to myself or others than anybody else; probably much less so. Especially given what I've been through, and the daily hell of not having freedom to think what I want, with this jerk in my head.. Maybe you've got one in your head, too. Although, I have to say, the voice was fun for a long time. I should have control over my mental experience, though. David has been served his eviction notice. Should I go to court?
Life is unfair, they say. It's crazy, too.

Shouldn't reality be kind of a toy, to play with? Stay young at heart!

Dreams and Mental Illness

A few thoughts:

First off,
The bible says (some) dreams come from God. The Matrix movie has dreams coming from a computer program. The children's song Row your boat says Life is but a dream. Morpheus, from mythology, is the God of dreams. I personally believe (most of) my dreams come from an imaginative "other," sent to my brain like radio waves to a radio/tv programs to a television/telepathy in a visual and auditory, mostly, form. I dream in color. I often remember my dreams. I have a theory that dreams prime us for the day ahead, or possibly further into the future, a kind of programming, perhaps. I have a theory that many of my dreams come specifically from David Eldridge, the same guy who's the voice in my head. Unlike the day, however, I don't care what imagery I get at night -even nightmares. I actually kind of like nightmares. Just like I like earthquakes, in real life. I also like it when it rains. But I do want privacy in my head during the day, Day-vid.

Wikipedia has some theories: Activation-synthesis, Continual Activation, Memory, and Functional. While I'm sure this has some relevance to my experience, I still believe my sleeping virtual reality to be based primarily on telepathic linkage, which I realize is not the common view.

Dreams and psychosis
A number of thinkers have commented on the similarities between the phenomenology of dreams and that of psychosis. Features common to the two states include thought disorder, flattened or inappropriate affect (emotion), and hallucination. Among philosophers, Kant, for example, wrote that ‘the lunatic is a wakeful dreamer’. (Does that make Martin Luther King, Jr. a psychotic?). Schopenhauer said: ‘A dream is a short-lasting psychosis, and a psychosis is a long-lasting dream.’ In the field of psychoanalysis, Freud wrote: ‘A dream then, is a psychosis’, and Jung: ‘Let the dreamer walk about and act like one awakened and we have the clinical picture of dementia praecox.’

McCreery has sought to explain these similarities by reference to the fact, documented by Oswald, that sleep can supervene as a reaction to extreme stress and hyper-arousal. McCreery adduces evidence that psychotics are people with a tendency to hyper-arousal, and suggests that this renders them prone to what Oswald calls ‘micro-sleeps’ during waking life. He points in particular to the paradoxical finding of Stevens and Darbyshire that patients suffering from catatonia can be roused from their seeming stupor by the administration of sedatives rather than stimulants.

Sometimes I feel like a Nut

Nut was an ancient Egyptian goddess, the god of the sky. Her name means "night."

Also spelled Nuit, this is obviously the etymology of the french word nuit (pron. nwee), meaning night. Unless Wikipedia got it backwards, and used the French meaning to inform the Egyptian word. Maybe I'll look into that.

Nut took the form of a woman arching herself over the sky. Some of the titles of Nut were Coverer of the Sky, She Who Protects, Mistress of All, and She Who Holds a Thousand Souls. Originally she was the goddess of the daytime sky, but in later times she was known simply as the sky goddess. Nut was said to be covered in stars touching the cardinal points of her body. Her headdress was the hieroglyphic of part of her name, a pot, which may also symbolize the uterus. The ancient Egyptians said that every woman was a nutrit, a little goddess.

Is this the origin of the word nutrition?

Sometimes Nut was considered to be the daughter and wife of Ra, at other times she was identified as his mother, who gave birth to him each morning (the pink dawn sky being the blood of this birth).

Nut also takes the form of a cow, a sow, and a sycamore tree.
Sycamore is quite a word: "sick o' more" or "sick amore" subconsciously embedded in there.

My name is Teshara, I share Ra, and I am a nut. In a nutshell.
The bible considered the nutshell to be the "firmament."

Nut was thought to draw the dead into her star-filled sky, and refresh them with food and wine: “I am Nut, and I have come so that I may enfold and protect you from all things evil.”

Jesus Christ, superstar. Hollywood stars. Everybody wants to shine their heavenly body. Teshara anagrams to 'he a star'. (a star, eh?) Jesus was nuts? He ascended into heaven, they say... Are there evil things out there in the stars?

Nuts.

I bet there are. Of course, "evil" might be a primitive way of putting it. They might just need to be understood, so they can be dealt with on their terms, like alligators or whatever. Alligators aren't evil. Under-stood...that evokes the picture of standing under a flying saucer, so we just need to hover over them, or something. I'm literally interpreting my own words, and kind of talking to myself. Ho hum.

Solutions for the World's Biggest Problems: My advance thinking

This Book is a Damn Good Read
I solve all the world's biggest problems myself in one blog post, lol.

I've already read the chapters on Terrorism, Conflict, and Malnutrition, along with some of the Introduction. Damn. This book is incredible. If Barack doesn't own a copy already, I'll mail him mine.

Anyway, a book becomes more interesting if you think through what your personal ideas are on each subject before you read it, so as to compare/contrast. I did that for the terrorism solutions chapter, last night, in my head.

I'll use this blog post to say my own ideas and opinions on what needs to be done for each of the 23 problems in this book, judged to be the "world's biggest." I have some background; I was an International Relations major in college. But I admit I'm no expert.

Anyway, the problems are:
Financial instability, lack of intellectual property rights, money laundering, subsidies and trade barriers, air pollution, climate change, deforestation, land degradation, the economics of biodiversity loss, vulnerability to natural disasters, arms proliferation, conflicts, corruption, lack of education, terrorism, drugs, disease control, lack of people of working age, living conditions of children, living conditions of women, hunger and malnutrition, unsafe water and lack of sanitation, and population: migration. (phew)

That's a buttload of problems. We shouldn't be sitting on our asses. Conviction, passion, and above all, action, are required. Everyone should be striving to make a difference, make others happy, keep themselves busy, and feel good by doing good. Get 'r done! That's my first, and main, solution.

Solve the worst problems first, would be my instinct, if sequentiality is even necessary. For me, that's obviously Feed the hungry and stop the killing. Teach them to fish, as the saying goes...create the conditions for development, which is a bit more complicated, like legal systems and banking and roads and hospitals and sewage and clean water and ending conflict. Also, if you take a long term view, maybe you want some people to suffer now so that people in the future will be better off. I don't know how you would make that kind of calculation. I think we have a moral duty to act in the present, on present conditions.

But, for policy makers in the world of ideas like the professors and staff who advise them, this book provides a valuable service on spending priorities, and directions for law, policy, and structure. I think common sense might work, too, but that's just me. They say common sense isn't that common..

Everything is derivative from 3 basic needs: intake: nutritious food and clean water, protection from the elements: appropriate clothes and shelter, health: physical and mental (love and companionship and friendships, and maybe medications). Life should be fun. It shouldn't be consumed with survival and scratching a living in miserable and squalid conditions under conditions of slave labor, or worse. Humanity is better than that.

1) Financial instability: If around half the world lives under 2 bucks a day, then the inequality and, I would say, injustice of the global economic system is evident. Marx considered this exploitation and would prove unstable, leading to revolution, which didn't exactly happen. And, it seems, workers around the world are still willing to work for a pittance/mere survival. They feel it is fate, or their lot, or can't be changed, or the way of the world, or whatever.

But capitalism has proven supreme, and everybody is chasing the almighty dolla billz (or yuan, or whatever). Global development will happen, in fits and starts, inexorably leading to better quality of life, we'd like to believe. I believe it. Everybody wants it. We will communally will it into being, actualize our dreams of comfort. But life, like matter, tends toward chaos and decay, says physics. So life is a struggle. We fight and we battle and we work for every gain, every display of order or improvement in a world that tends toward dissolution. Every decision, every action, even every breath, while seeming to be a trifle, can prove to be a big thing, in its consequences. The butterfly effect shows us this. Life is mad. Anything could happen. The economy could tank from one anarchist's bullet, like in World War I. So we make it sane. We believe in God, and everything makes sense, somehow. From the other direction, religion serves as a vehicle for social control. Maybe I'm getting off track. Does God control the economy? Is there a moral dimension to poverty and wealth? Does karma, or justice, or whatever you want to call it, control things like decisions at the Fed or personal opportunities and mistakes? Maybe I do, lol. Satan means "to overcome." It's an allegory for gaining knowledge. We should make informed decisions about our money. ANyway, the economy has historically gone in cycles, and fluctuations between bear and bull are a natural result of the billions of economic interactions that form the national and international economies, from day to day, and across longer periods of time. The ideal is to have it go up, up, and away. My personal take on the economy (as someone that doesn't work..) is that some people believe in what they do, enjoy their jobs, work hard, and consequently probably earn alot, or else earn in happiness what they don't earn in money. Everyone else is doing something that they've just ended up doing, and halfheartedly go about keeping their reputation, or something. I don't know if most people are lazy, exactly, or shirk their duty, but I would say the bare minimum that needs to get done, or less, might be the actual state of affairs, with people obsessed with entertainment and personal pleasure at the expense of important priorities. I think a fair percentage of humanity procrastinates and avoids. So our financial house of cards is vulnerable. The economy is supported by psychological pillars, like getting everybody worked up about terrorist threats, to support the military-industrial complex, and the like. I admit I don't actually know, though.

The solution? Mandatory changing of jobs every (what, 3 years?) until people are really happy in their positions that they might not otherwise have been exposed to. I know, I'm crazy. It's just a thought. Productivity would increase as job satisfaction increases.

2) Lack of intellectual property rights: I admit I have copied alot of music in my day. In college, I spent a good chunk of time copying portions of other people's music collections (onto tape, lol). I think artists should be supported by the state at a just comfortable enough level to enjoy life, with the added option of going on tour or whatever to earn more, so that all music or video or whatever can be made available for free to the entire world. My mantra? Happiness!

3) Money laundering: I used to leave money in my pockets, before my mom washed my clothes. She told me she would keep whatever she found. Likewise, any illegal usage of banks should be penalized by confiscating the money for use in worthy causes.

4)Subsidies and trade barriers: I don't actually know what a subsidy is. Is that like when a farmer is paid to not grow on his land? That kind of thing sounds stupid (but maybe the land needs to recover..) I've heard of farm subsidies in Europe, which I think is the government paying farmers above what they get on the market (?) Food is a basic need, so maybe this kind of thing should depend on whether the product is essential or not. I would say tobacco, or even wine, might not be the best use of land, in a world undergoing a food crisis. My classical economic education has told me that more money is created when everybody specializes in what they do best, throughout the world, without artificially creating wealth through advertising, or bribes that create contracts for multinational corporations that rob third world countries of their resources and give the value-added to economic centers far away, where the fruits of their labor and land go unreaped, or protectionist policies that support dying industries, that are just artificially propped up to support a constituency that in all rationality should be looking for work elsewhere, so as not to rob both domestic taxpayers and the location of true expertise/ advantage of their rightfully earned due. Free trade of people, products, and services creates the most wealth, mathematically. But perhaps there are some cases of injustice, and poor distribution of that wealth, that should be addressed.

5) air pollution: that's easy, find the sources of the toxins and stink, and eliminate them. Replace them with better technologies. The past is sticky. It pervades, and endures, stubbornly. We have to be willing to shed outdated technologies for newer ones, which seem to be developed all the time, that are cleaner and better, by whatever criteria. If change were implemented across all segments of society, faster -progress toward what we all want- we'd be a happier world. Is it really the best of all possible worlds, already?

6)climate change: Well, Al Gore really put this one on the map. Worst case scenario: a sea level rise of up to 44 feet. Wow. That would happen gradually, though, and the result would probably be alot of crazy moving of structures and art to higher ground. I've seen houses on stilts, and trucks moving wide loads on the highway, and that could become a widespread reality. Invest in housemoving companies? Unfortunately, global warming also entails heat waves, hurricanes, floods, and species loss. It changes weather patterns, so some places might even get colder.

Solution? Stop burning so much damn fuel. Aircraft use ALOT, and I've heard the contrails they leave seed clouds and change the weather. I'm not sure if that's good or bad. But the weather can be controlled, somewhat. Changing the composition of the air, though, is a different matter. So large users of fossil fuels, like the military (which shouldn't even exist, in my opinion), should cease and desist, or stand down, soldier. People should make friends and carpool and take Greyhound across the country, meet people, see the land, slow down, relax, and do things like bicycle (good for your health, too) and plant trees and buy carbon offsets.

7) deforestation: protect the forests, and the life they support, to the extent we can, and plant new trees. I love trees. People who need fuel should be supplied with the best option. People who need farmland should be able to live off the forest, and buy food from the vast mechanized farms that don't clearcut valuable forest that gives us oxygen, acts as a carbon sink, and support wildlife and plants with medicinal purposes. I know, I'm an enviro-zombie.

8) land degradation: I barely even know what this is in reference to. Erosion? Depletion of nutrients in overfarmed soil, I think. Soil pollution is a big problem in America, with the Superfund sites, that used to have little stickers at gas stations saying something about it, like money went to the fund, or something. Groundwater gets polluted as water filters through polluted soil. The military, always the bad guys, have been responsible for a buttload of pollution. Solution? Dunno, criminals in hazmat suits keepin' themselves busy? More weekend projects done by community organizations to stop erosion, like I used to do for the Boy Scouts? Give the soil a rest, with each farm having free soil analysis, like how utility companies give free analyses of your home for energy conservation?

9)economics of biodiversity loss: we should have a lot more scientists classifying all the unclassified organisms on our planet. I think that's a pretty cool job. Wouldn't tromping around in a forest be more fun than slogging through paperwork in an office? Anyway, we're in the midst of a massive extinction event, and we'll be lucky to get out of it alive, ourselves, I think. They say we're all ecologically interdependent, is why I say this. So money aside, I think it would be sad to be the last beetle or whatever of your kind to be alive. I empathize. We should respect life, above and beyond seeing them as economic resources. But we need to eat, and fish should remain plentiful, I guess, although I'm sure they don't like getting eaten any more than we would. We don't even know the half of what we should, I imagine, about how the whole system of life on our planet sustains itself. It's biology and chemistry and economics and the whole shebang, I guess. This area is one for the really smart people, or computer models, or something. Biodiversity includes plants, too. Plants and animals both provide food and medicines and materials for human endeavor. In my opinion, the economics of it is far less important than the moral imperative to prevent entire species from dying. Extinctions happen, though, and always have. So, whatever. They should be limited as far as possible, in my opinion. Let's not be too fatalistic. Species preservation shouldn't just be in isolated little populations at zoos. The earth should be a thriving ecosystem, not a dying overheated ball of sadness.

10) vulnerability to natural disasters: better earthquake detection technology is in the works; I read the weather satellite we have is getting old, so we should send up a really good one; and all possible eventualities should be assessed, and the proper authorities notified of the estimated probabilities of any event happening in whatever time period -updated whenever new people come into office. Homeowners should be aware of whatever probability the volcano they live next to or whatever will go off during whatever time period they specify; and, communities, neighborhood associations, and the like, in addition to discussing the crime in their areas with a local police officer, should also relay important information about risks and insurance and preventive measures.

11)arms proliferation: well, to be clear, we're not talking about the appendages attached to your shoulders (although they can be lethal weapons, too). As I have said, I think every community should have a firing range where families can practice their marksmanship and learn safety. Every adult should have access to a gun, to protect themselves or their property. Crime would go down, surely. But, as a caveat, automatic weapons and weapons more obviously designed for combat, as opposed to self-defense, should be eliminated. We don't need sniper rifles in wide circulation, or mac-10's, or AK-47's, or M-16's, or sawed off shotguns. Maybe just semi-automatic handguns. People with hunter's permits could have rifles. As for lawless or ungoverned regions in the world, the less guns, the better. An environment with guns needs to be policed under the rule of law, to prevent abuse. All the military hardware floating around out there should be collected and melted down, with economic incentives for turning them in, and legal punishments for their use, worldwide. Guns should not be "cool." They should be scary, and an instrument of last resort, that one is comfortable with enough to use well and safely. If you're into fighting, take up martial arts. Martial arts should be widespread, for self-confidence, health, and mental discipline.

12)conflicts: war is a ridiculous and stupid activity. People should be proud of the evidence of their strength, as shown by NOT fighting. This value should be globally instilled in all cultures. If people need to fight, they should do so non-lethally. Boxing rinks at gyms and martial arts studios with periodic competitions should be our healthy outlet for aggression, along with video games and paintball and sports and such.

13) corruption: Kindness is my religion. I'm God. It should be yours, too. Play fair. Work for betterment, not just for money. Measure your value in values and achievements, not currency. Believe in karma. You should. It exists. I imagine the book will talk about providing financial incentives for achieving laudable goals, to offset the temptation to take bribes or whatever. That, too.

14) education: like I've already said, all the world's books should be available to everyone for free, through cheap computers linked to the internet. Or even cheaper devices, just for reading.
Of course, paper books work, too. Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body. And children should be allowed to follow their interests. Lifelong learning should be a universal value. People should keep lists of questions.

15) terrorism: inspire youth toward peaceful activity -adults, for that matter, too- and address the causes of anger in productive ways, so the impassioned feel good about causing improvement, and get to see the results of their actions, rather than taking action to make the world better through the tragic and traumatic action of suicide, which only causes damage -that they never see. Duh, right? Give someone 80 virgins on earth, lol, if they actually achieve a currently desired goal, PEACEFULLY. That's what muslim suicide bombers are promised, I've heard. Plus, the whole concept of Paradise is kind of silly. No one has a soul that goes anywhere when you die. That's a story for children.

16) drugs: Schwarzenegger said in Pumping Iron that his exercise felt like cumming. It's a natural rush of energy. Runners have their runner's high. Reading a good book can make you feel good. Or a good movie. There are all kinds of healthy things to get addicted to, instead of things that carry the risk of killing you. People on drugs need to listen to Huey Lewis. Seriously, just say no. To be technical, food is a drug, though. You can have your occasional flamin' hot cheetos. If you say yes to drugs, be smart; be careful. Even just pot can trigger schizophrenia, if you're predisposed.

17) disease control: Life is our most valuable asset; money doesn't even matter, in regards to it. So, doctors and researchers are really doing an incredibly valuable service. If they need more people, they should get them. All hands on deck. Use prisoners. High school kids. I dunno, it's got to feel good to be a part of such an important project, the healing and curing of diseases. Obviously, people should be taught about germs, and brushing teeth, and how not to get aids, and safe sex, and first aid, and cpr, and the heimlich maneuver, or whatever else. I'm getting off topic, a bit. For malaria, which I know something about, bed nets should always be available, and used, just like we automatically put our seat belts on before going anywhere in our cars. There's a new promising treatment for malaria discovered by Australian scientists. And obviously, if there are threats like the H5N1 bird flu that could become worldwide epidemics, then we've gotta do what we've gotta do. Spare no expense.

18)lack of people of working age: this is really a problem? I thought the world demographic was young.. like young adults or in their 20's.. prime of life.. so this one, I don't know.

19)living conditions of women: In the 3W, they are known for carrying wood and water and being less educated and, in the case of the taleban, kept out of sight behind walls or burqa's. Solution: free their minds, if they can't get out of the home -provide books. Change the culture to one of equality, in schools and politics and business.

20)living conditions of children: they should learn and explore and play, not work. They should have loving parents, and go to school, or for the infants, get the care and attention they need.

21)hunger and malnutrition: ridiculous. I shouldn't even have to say anything. Duh. Everyone should eat good quality and quantity food. The world should absolutely guarantee no starvation for anybody. America has so much food. Obesity is a worldwide problem. All it takes is logistics. Peanut butter, and algae, are some malnutrition solutions.

22)unsafe water and lack of sanitation: God. This is another one. How lame are we? Every government should have this solved by now. How the hell could we spend so much on our defense budgets, without doing this for our fellow man?

23)population: migration: Personally, I think borders should ALL be open. The whole world should be humanity's playground. But my wife thinks the richer areas would become like the poorer ones. Couldn't tell you.. An interesting theory. I think, if we all could, there would be a huge amount of travel, because we're all curious people. People would work and live and visit much more than they do, now. I get the economist. I'm with the opinion that migration is good. It's good for the host country's economy -migrants are hard workers. I'm a bit fuzzy on the difference between immigration and emigration. Is that coming in and going out? Are they the same thing?

Symbol of God

One, Infinity, Love

1, 8 (sideways), <3>