Français/French Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified

Welcome!

I, God, welcome you to my blog!

The good book says only God is good, so it seems to me somebody needs to step up.

I hope you enjoy reading this, the Jesse Journal, as much as I have enjoyed writing it. Please feel free to subscribe, write me an email, request that I write about any particular topic you may want my perspective on, send a prayer, click on the charity link, or donate money to my bicycle fund! Have fun!

Your pal, Jess
L-I'm a straight, virgo/boar INTJ (age 52) who enjoys books, getting out into nature, music, and daily exercise.

(my email is JesseGod@live.com)

F.Y.I. There are about 2200 posts..

Here's a quote from Fyodor Dostoevsky to start things off right: Love the animals, love the plants, love everything. If you love everything, you will perceive the divine mystery in things. Once you perceive it, you will begin to comprehend it better every day. And you will come at last to love the whole world with an all-embracing love.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Compassionate Conservative?

The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
a book by Vincent Bugliosi

Read an excerpt; LINK.

It's pretty sad.
I know we want to be bipartisan and reach across the aisle, but geez.
Hopefully people can separate party identity from personal criminality.
I don't think the "incompetent" excuse should hold up for Bush.
I read that he doesn't read. Well, he's the president. Ignorance is no excuse, either.
They say lies are legal, but when they lead to war? That should definitely be illegal, if it isn't already. In fact, just as I think lying during campaigns ought to be illegal, I think lying while in office should be off limits, as well. Public officials hold a public trust.
As I read this, I'm saying to myself, am I somehow against free speech? Maybe, when it comes to policy making, where lives are at stake, policy makers' speech should be constrained to the truth, in good-faith, as if they were under oath, or talking to the American people as if they were law enforcement officers.
I'm going to buy this book.

a comment
Lying is illegal only when done under oath (perjury) or to a law enforcement officer (obstruction of justice). Bush and co. are very careful not to do either. Usually by invoking "executive privilege". The lies that were told resulted in a "Congressional Authorization" to use force. This makes the military action and subsequent deaths of 4000 Americans and uncounted Iraqis legal in U.S. courts.

Is this true?
Another article on the book; LINK.
Question: If Bush gives a speech to an audience that includes peace officers, can they enforce obstruction of justice?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Congrats, Barack

Lots to do!

I plan on sending Michelle a pair of American flag earrings, from Main Element in Calistoga. That would be cool, to see her wearing them.

Anyway,
my plan for Iraq is to build lots of health clubs, and boxing clubs, for Iraqis to get healthy in, and channel their aggressions through, so they can box each other instead of shooting each other up. This applies anywhere, I think. I know, it's simplistic, but that and martial arts like Aikido (the way of peace) might really make a better world. There should be a whole array of solutions like this. Whatever works, you know? Use the ideas of the internet, from the whole world.

He should make a more public deal, in my opinion, of having been a smoker and having quit, and how he works out and plays basketball. So much of America and the world is overweight or in need of lifestyle change, that should be modelled on the President's Council for Fitness. Happiness? Cure to misery? Action, Exercise.....ENDORPHINS!

I think the world wants to know more about the real Obama, like - can he dunk? or, what kind of dog did the kids get and what is it's name? What music is on his playlist, and what are some of his favorite movies? I'm happy I'm on his email list, and can be a part, in whatever way, of his administration. I have a recommendation: he should talk to Bill Gates and get the white house outfitted with all the cool bleep that Bill has in his model home. Not too crazy, though. Sober and practical, with less emphasis on the infinite entertainment America is so obsessed with distracting itself with.

Stick to the basics: cost-benefit analysis of all the solutions out there to get moving on the ones that will work for the best reward, to govern effectively, really crunching the numbers. I cried on election day...but not what you think. I woke up early, and there was a slideshow on our new Dish network on the UC station by a photographer who had covered Congo (and Somalia). Really crazy sad stuff. The rapes, the absolute poverty and suffering, the machete hacking of limbs, the lack of almost any healthcare (it's too dangerous for doctor's without borders), cannibalism, child soldiers, the ruination of what could be a really successful country with it's resources by a government that has consolidated it's power through tyrannical killing, it's really sickening. I hope he doesn't just get dry facts from his intelligence professionals, but movies and slideshows that really reveal the faces of what's happening in the world. I hope there are fireside chats that really inspire people to make a difference, as they say, that relay what his thought process is, with some transparency. In a word, cold calculations and number-crunching, and warmhearted and passionate kindness and considerations, for the most needy, in the US, and throughout the entire world, where really it's pretty damned bad in some places. The president is in an exceptionally good position to relieve suffering.

I also think it would be cool if he could relay to the people some information that he might be privy to about aliens, if that's even possible.

As for security, he can respond to Russia and Afghanistan with maybe unilaterally eliminating our nuclear arsenal (but not our capability, just like how Japan could make nukes in a short time, despite not having a military), to show that we won't continue to be the hypocritical country that builds more of them while not allowing others (sovereign states, I might add) to not have them, because we think we're so morally superior. Seriously, I don't think anyone in their right mind wants the threat of nuclear detonation, so let's work together internationally to really eliminate the damned things. Yes we can! Also, our military simply has to stop killing civilians. I assume we don't want to, already, but we shouldn't deny it, or call it "collateral damage" or depersonalize the injustice, that really puts America at risk, I would imagine.

100,000 Iraqis I heard have been killed. CNN always puts up the American casualty numbers on their ticker on the bottom of the screen, with nary a mention of the Iraqi devastation/slaughter. That isn't right. Let's please consider ourselves humans over Americans, and really try to inspire each other that national interest is really the worldwide interest, embodied in each individual, who more or less want the same things, like opportunity (read: wealth, comfort), hope (read: real progress, change, improvement, development), peace (read: security, absence of war, presence of things like peace corps, doctors without borders, understanding, relationships between people of different countries and cultures), health (thriving, not just survival), and of course, an environment that doesn't threaten to collapse on us. Smile, cuz YES WE CAN.

As for the economy, well it's pretty psychological and crazy, so we have to pull whatever levers and push whatever buttons to keep things humming along, I guess. Theoretically, what if there were no money, though? Could it even be conceivable that people would all work hard to make life good for themselves and others without it? Economics was never my subject, and I always think a purchaser of anything should just have the money and make the transaction, without all this paying money for money stuff. Savings need to be emphasized, in my opinion. What do I know, though. I'm crazy. Isn't the stock market like gambling? Isn't the profit motive somewhat inhuman? Aren't there crazy amounts of externalities, that markets just don't account for? The winner is not he who dies with the most toys...it's whoever relieves the most suffering and makes the most happiness. Toys are overrated in the happiness game.

Okay, signing out,
God (lol)

p.s. I think the "America is the best country in the world" is fine and all, but I had a thought today that that's like saying "Jews are god's people" or "Republicans are the true patriots": it's exclusionary and a bit ridiculous.